One of the real problems with AI right now is that it is so verbose! I can only imagine the amount of text that has been generated in the 10 months since ChatGPT was released.

Here’s the feedback using the tool eduaide.

I pasted my text from yesterday into it, and asked it to give semantic feedback, which would focus on logic and reasoning of my writing:

You may notice that I could have also given custom feedback, more on that in a moment.

Here’s the response directly pasted from the tool:

Overall, the student text presents a strong argument about the requirements of democracy in education. The writer effectively uses logic and reasoning to support their points and incorporates rhetorical devices to engage the reader. However, there are areas for improvement in terms of clarity and organization.

1. Argumentation:

• The writer establishes the significance of the topic by stating that it is fundamental to the future of society.

• They effectively use Arthur E. Bestor's observation to support the claim that schools must prepare students for democratic participation.

• The writer presents three key points: foundational skills, fostering a love for learning, and a child-centric approach. These points are well-supported with evidence and examples.

2. Logic and Reasoning:

• The writer uses logical reasoning to explain that foundational skills like reading, writing, and arithmetic are essential for democratic participation.

• They provide a clear rationale for the importance of nurturing a love for learning over mere schooling, linking it to John Dewey's criticism of traditional education.

• The writer's argument for a child-centric approach is supported by the idea that it promotes engagement, critical thinking, and individual initiative.

3. Rhetorical Devices:

• The writer effectively uses rhetorical questions, such as "What will happen when parents find out we've been lying all this time?" and "How to get class sizes down to 16 per teacher in a pandemic: focus on families?" These questions engage the reader and make the arguments more compelling.

• The use of vivid language, like comparing traditional education to a "velour sweatsuit," adds depth and creativity to the text.

• The writer incorporates personal experiences, such as blog posts and a podcast, to provide real-life examples and further engage the reader.

Areas for Improvement:

1. Clarity and Organization:

• The writer could benefit from providing clearer transitions between ideas and paragraphs. This would help the reader follow the logical progression of the argument more easily.

• It would be helpful to provide a clear roadmap or thesis statement at the beginning of the text to outline the main points that will be discussed.

2. Use of Evidence:

• While the writer incorporates personal experiences and references to external sources, more direct evidence, such as research studies or expert opinions, could further strengthen the argumentation.

3. Counterarguments:

• To enhance the overall persuasiveness of the text, the writer could address and refute potential counterarguments. This would demonstrate a strong understanding of opposing viewpoints and strengthen the writer's own position.

Actionable Steps for Improved Quality:

1. Revise the text to provide clearer transitions between ideas and paragraphs. Consider using transition words and phrases to guide the reader through the logical progression of the argument.

2. Consider providing a clear thesis statement or roadmap at the beginning of the text to outline the main points that will be discussed.

3. Incorporate more direct evidence, such as research studies or expert opinions, to support the arguments made.

4. Address potential counterarguments and refute them to strengthen the overall persuasiveness of the text.

5. Proofread the text for grammar and spelling errors to ensure clarity and professionalism.

By implementing these suggestions, the writer can further improve the quality and effectiveness of their argumentation, logic, reasoning, and use of rhetorical devices.

OK, back to Jethro. If you’re still reading, this feedback is 514 words, only 15 words less than my original post.

That’s quite long for feedback, when it doesn’t really need to be that long, in my opinion.

That being said, maybe some people would like more detailed and elaborative feedback.

Also, it said to proofread the text for grammar and spelling errors, but there were not spelling or grammar errors, so I don’t know why it would suggest that specific feedback.

I submitted another shot at the feedback with a custom prompt:

This feedback was only 155 words, still not as short as I wanted, but it was limited to 3 bullet points.

Overall, the essay effectively argues for the importance of democracy in education. The writer provides clear points and supports them with references to relevant sources. The essay demonstrates a strong understanding of the topic and makes a compelling case for foundational skills, fostering a love for learning, and adopting a child-centric approach.

Suggestions for improvement:

1. To enhance the logical flow of the essay, consider providing more explicit transitions between paragraphs. This will help the reader follow the writer's train of thought more easily.

2. While the use of personal anecdotes and references to blog posts and podcasts adds depth, it may be beneficial to balance these with additional scholarly sources to strengthen the argument.

3. To further strengthen the essay's reasoning, consider addressing potential counterarguments or alternative perspectives.

Overall, this is a well-written and thought-provoking essay. The writer effectively supports their points with evidence, and their passion for democratic education shines through. Keep up the good work!

Shorter, more clear feedback. I can dig it.

What’s really amazing is that I can take this same feedback and generate it in Russian.

Отличная работа! Ваше сочинение ясно и логично аргументировано. Однако вам стоит уделить больше внимания следующим аспектам:

1. Подкрепите свои доводы конкретными примерами и исследованиями.

2. Обратите внимание на организацию текста - добавьте вступление и заключение, чтобы укрепить структуру вашего эссе.

3. Обязательно укажите источники и ссылки на вашу информацию.

Продолжайте развиваться и улучшать свои навыки письма! Ваша статья содержит важные идеи о демократическом образовании, и я уверен, что с вашим потенциалом вы сможете стать великим лидером в этой области.

Side note, Russian feedback clocked in at 76 words. But Russian is good at using fewer words than English.